Mississippi Governor Signs Bill Banning Common Second Trimester Abortion Method

Illustration for article titled Mississippi Governor Signs Bill Banning Common Second Trimester Abortion Method

Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant has signed a bill banning a common second trimester abortion method, dilation and evacuation. The bill leaves just a sliver of a loophole, allowing the procedure only to prevent “irreversible physical impairment.” Mississippi has only one abortion clinic, who are quite likely to sue over this.

Advertisement

The bill, HB 519, was creatively termed the “Mississippi Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act.” It only allows for D&E’s in the event of a “serious health risk:”

“Serious health risk to the unborn child’s mother” 72 means that in reasonable medical judgment, she has a condition that so complicates her medical condition that it necessitates the abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or to avert serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including psychological or emotional conditions. No such condition may be determined to exist if it is based on a claim or diagnosis that the woman will engage in conduct that she intends to result in her death or in substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.

Advertisement

Dilation and evacuation is used in roughly 95% of second trimester abortions and following miscarriages; banning the procedure amounts to a near-total ban on abortions after 14 weeks. The bill is identical, as Rewire points out, to the model legislation written by the National Right to Life Committee. As you can imagine, they’re delighted:

But D&E bans have been struck down by state courts in Kansas and Oklahoma; one passed in West Virginia in March only after the legislature overrode the governor’s veto.

The last remaining abortion clinic in Mississippi is Jackson Women’s Health, also known as “the Little Pink House.” Owner Diane Derzis told WKRG the state is inviting a lawsuit.

Advertisement

Jackson Women’s Health in 2013. Photo via AP

Anna Merlan was a Senior Reporter at G/O Media until September 2019. She's the author of Republic of Lies: American Conspiracy Theorists and Their Surprising Rise to Power.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

presigh
pre-emptive sigh

Should probably try to reformulate the pro-choice argument in the south so that it’s less about women’s rights (which they don’t give a damn about) and try to make it sound more like property rights or gun rights (which they do care about).

-If the government can’t force someone to donate a kidney to save someone else’s life, how can they force a woman to use her uterus to do the same?

-If someone is in your house against your will, you are within your rights to have them removed by whatever means necessary (up to and including lethal force). How can the same logic not apply to a person’s body?