Devin Nunes Suing Twitter, Twitter Accounts 'Devin Nunes' Mom' & 'Devin Nunes' Cow'

Illustration for article titled Devin Nunes Suing Twitter, Twitter Accounts Devin Nunes Mom  Devin Nunes Cow
Image: via Getty

House Representative and noted memo writer Devin Nunes has filed a $250 million lawsuit against Twitter, alleging the social media platform has allowed trolls to say mean things to him and make him feel bad.

Advertisement

According to the Daily Beast, the trolls in question are two anonymous Twitter accounts, “Devin Nunes’ Mom” (@DevinNunesMom), and “Devin Nunes’ Cow” (@DevinCow), both of whom are also named in the suit, in addition to political consultant Liz Mair. Nunes says Twitter, a website that lets Nazis harass journalists, has demonstrated a “political agenda” by allowing these accounts to exist.

Nunes’s suit also claims that Twitter has been shadow-banning Nunes and other conservatives (a pretty common, yet unfounded gripe among the right), and that said shadow-banning amplified the trolls.

Advertisement

There’s some great stuff in the complaint:

In 2018, Twitter shadow-banned Plaintiff in order to restrict his free speech and to amplify the abusive and hateful content published and republished by Mair, Devin Nunes’ Mom, Devin Nunes’ cow, Fire Devin Nunes, Devin Nunes Grapes, and others. The shadow-banning was intentional. It was calculated to interfere with and influence the federal election and interfere with Nunes’ ongoing investigation as a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

I had not heard of any of these Devin Nunes troll accounts, but thanks to Nunes’s lawsuit, I have had ample opportunity to peruse some of their content. Devin Nunes’ Cow, which has 4,485 followers (including Jake Tapper!) mostly appears to retweet #Resistance accounts. Devin Nunes’ Grapes, which has 30 followers, has made a total of eight tweets. Devin Nunes, a U.S. Congressman, has 388,000 followers.

Devin Nunes’ Mom’s account has been suspended, but Nunes’s lawyers helpfully included some of the account’s tweets in their complaint:

Advertisement

All this is also in the complaint:

In her endless barrage of tweets, Devin Nunes’ Mom maliciously attacked every aspect of Nunes’ character, honesty, integrity, ethics and fitness to perform his duties as a UnitedStates Congressman. Devin Nunes’ Mom stated that Nunes had turned out worse than Jacob Wohl; falsely accused Nunes of being a racist, having “white supremist friends”and distributing “disturbing inflammatory racial propaganda”;

....falsely accused Nunes of putting up a “Fake News MAGA” sign outside a Texas Holocaust museum; falsely stated that Nunes would probably join the “Proud Boys”, “if it weren’t for that unfortunate ‘nomasturbating’ rule”; disparagingly called him a “presidential fluffer and swamp rat”;falsely stated that Nunes had brought “shame” to his family; repeatedly accused Nunes of the crime of treason, compared him to Benedict Arnold, and called him a “traitor”,“treasonous shitbag”, a “treasonous Putin shill”, working for the “Kremlin”; falsely stated that Nunes was “100% bought and sold....

Advertisement

Again, I basically live on the internet and had not once come across a troll account specifically designed to torment Devin Nunes, but thanks to this complaint, I know that Devin Nunes’ Mom tweeted that “Devin might be a unscrupulous, craven, back-stabbing, charlatan and traitor, but he’s no Ted Cruz.” Someone please give Nunes’s legal team a Shorty Award, and, please, no one tell him about discovery.

Night blogger, author of GOOD THINGS HAPPEN TO PEOPLE YOU HATE.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

omgponies-at
OMG!PONIES!

I, for one, am glad for this lawsuit and look forward to quoting Nunes v. Twitter, Inc., in which the court expressly held, in relevant part, as follows:

“Hey dumbass, the First Amendment only offers protections against censorship by the government, not private corporations, meaning that, even assuming Nunes’ dumbass argument, Nunes’ First Amendment rights were not violated in the least because, yeah, if Twitter wanted to ‘shadow-ban’ Nunes, it would be allowed to so.”

I also look forward to the court handing @DevinNunesAss (which if not a Twitter account, should be, and it should be a verbiose one at that given the amount of talking Nunes does out of his ass) to him, saying that it does not appreciate Nunes’ blatant forum-shopping, given that both Nunes and Twitter are California domiciliaries and, surely, California is a far better venue in which to bring this suit.

I also look forward to Nunes being directed to pay Twitter’s and Mair’s legal fees and his attorney being referred to the Virginia State Bar because, as the Court should properly note, Devin Nunes is, by his own admission, a Congressman with a long and illustrious career in the House of Representatives so, surely he is aware of Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act of 1996 which confers immunity on companies that publish internet content generated by users.

I will gleefully laugh at when the Court notes, in a passing footnote, that Nunes offers absolutely no support from his actual allegation in the Complaint that “The ability to use Twitter is a vital part of modern citizenship” and reminds Nunes that he is free to join other social networks such as Gab.

Finally, I am perplexed why someone as powerful and influential and celebrated as Nunes would hire some shmo lawyer who has been disciplined by his state Bar by having his license suspended for a year to bring this case in fucking Henrico County, Virginia.