A Federal Judge Has Blocked an Arkansas Law Banning Abortions After 18 Weeks

Illustration for article titled A Federal Judge Has Blocked an Arkansas Law Banning Abortions After 18 Weeks
Image: via Getty

A federal judge has issued an injunction against a series of abortion restrictions in the state of Arkansas, including one banning the procedure after 18 weeks. The injunction also prevents the closure of the state’s last surgical abortion clinic.

Advertisement

The Wall Street Journal reports that on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker issued a preliminary injunction blocking three of the dozen anti-abortion bills Arkansas passed this legislative session. One, the state’s “Cherish Act,” would prohibit abortion at 18 weeks. The second, Senate Bill 448, mandates that abortion providers be OB/GYN board-eligible or certified. (Medical organizations have called this an unnecessary requirement, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists opposes it.) The third, “Down Syndrome Discrimination by Abortion Prohibition Act,” prohibits an abortion if the person is seeking one because fetal Down Syndrome was detected.

Arkansas has only two abortion clinics, a Planned Parenthood and a Family Planning Services, both of which are in Little Rock, and the latter of which is the only clinic that performs surgical abortions.

Advertisement

But the clinic does not have an OB/GYN board-eligible or certified practitioner, and Senate Bill 448 would have forced it to close, prompting Baker to rule that the bill “imposes substantial burdens on a large fraction of women seeking abortions in Arkansas that ‘substantially outweigh’ any state interest or any benefits to those women.”

In fact, CNN reports, Baker ruled that all three laws “cause ongoing and imminent irreparable harm to the plaintiffs and their patients,” and that “the harms to women who are unable to obtain abortion care as a result of (the acts) are irreparable.” The 18-week ban, Baker argued, is unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade, though certainly Roe’s fate hangs in the balance.

The state’s attorney general’s office has filed an appeal in response to Baker’s injunction.

Night blogger, author of GOOD THINGS HAPPEN TO PEOPLE YOU HATE.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

rijf7ojdulbg
rijf7ojdulbg

Why are they specifically targeting Down Syndrome?

I terminated a very wanted pregnancy because the baby had Down Syndrome. It was the right decision and I’ve never regretted it, but it was the worst thing that ever happened to me.

Down syndrome is a serious condition. I could give you lists of all the health problems that come with Down Syndrome, but it’s upsetting to me to read them and you can google them yourselves. The lists are long, very long. Only about 10% of people with Down Syndrome ever live alone without assistance, most have several expensive health conditions.

People with Down syndrome live longer now and have richer lives than just a few decades ago, but it’s not all sunshine and roses. Chronic health conditions that require surgeries, monitoring and medications, many have mental health issues, ALL with Down syndrome get early onset dementia. 

I know there are parents of people with Down Syndrome who couldn’t imagine life without their kids, but it should be a choice, just like with any other severe birth defect. Are they trying to force people with other chromosomal defects to carry to term too?